Our first “Binding Conciliation” session was completed yesterday. We are under an undertaking of confidentiality and thus cannot share any information at this point other than to say that it was a “med-arb” session involving the conciliation panel.
Nous avons eu une première séance de « conciliation exécutoire » hier. Étant donné que nous avons pris un engagement de confidentialité, nous pouvons seulement relater qu´il s´agissait d´une séance de médiation-arbitrage avec un bureau de conciliation.
On behalf of our members and in close collaboration with the other bargaining agents, the AJC has used virtually every available mechanism to put pressure on the Government and
Au nom des membres et en étroite collaboration avec les autres agents négociateurs, l´AJJ a emprunté, sans exception, tous les mécanismes existants pour faire pression sur le gouvernement et elle continue d´exhorter les élus à redoubler d´efforts pour remédier rapidement à la situation et pour
The AJC has formally requested a change to switch from conciliation/strike route to "binding conciliation" for the current round of collective bargaining.
Treasury Board has promised to provide their wage comparability study to the negotiation team for review by the end of October 2016.
The AJC negotiations team met with Treasury Board negotiators on Wednesday in a resuscitated effort after the AJC protested Treasury Board's unilateral decision to cancel bargaining (see art
The AJC negotiations team met with Treasury Board negotiators on December 19 and 20. Some progress was made on technical changes and minor issues.
Our mediation session with the conciliation panel was held last Wednesday and it was regrettably unproductive.
As you know, on December 20th 2016, Treasury Board (TB) rejected our proposals on pay and on compensatory leave and made no counter proposals. TB tabled no proposal to address the fact that federal government lawyers are paid significantly less than their provincial counterparts for doing the sa